Asus Nvidea Geforce Gt Oc 2gb 1030 Reviews
Our Verdict
Although we might take hoped for better performance in taxing graphics workloads, Nvidia's GeForce GT 1030 performs admirably in the competitive gaming titles it was designed to service. Moreover, a low price, power-friendly architecture, and compelling form factor make the card accessible to merely virtually anyone with an available PCIe slot.
For
- Starts at $seventy
- Remarkably depression 30W TDP
- Excellent performance in eSports and DirectX9/11-based games
- Single-slot/depression-profile class factor
Against
- Trails AMD'south Radeon RX 550 in DX12/Vulkan-based games
Tom's Hardware Verdict
Although we might have hoped for meliorate performance in taxing graphics workloads, Nvidia's GeForce GT 1030 performs admirably in the competitive gaming titles it was designed to service. Moreover, a depression cost, ability-friendly architecture, and compelling form cistron make the bill of fare accessible to simply about anyone with an bachelor PCIe slot.
Pros
- +
Starts at $70
- +
Remarkably low 30W TDP
- +
Excellent performance in eSports and DirectX9/11-based games
- +
Unmarried-slot/low-profile form factor
Cons
- -
Trails AMD's Radeon RX 550 in DX12/Vulkan-based games
See GeForce GT 1030 2GB
[ May 2020 Update : If y'all're reading this review hoping to notice the all-time graphics card that volition allow you play games without spending a lot of money, pricing and availability for the sometime GT 1030 are spotty right now, leading to sometimes college prices. Unless you specifically need a low profile menu like this Gigabyte GT 1030 or Asus GT 1030 , we recommend moving up to at least a Radeon RX 560 for $twenty more. Just if y'all're serious about playing games, check our GPU Hierarchy and try to get at least something similar a GTX 1650 Super or better.]
Once upon a time, Nvidia's GeForce GT 730 was the atomic number 82-off hitter for our listing of Best Graphics Cards. It sold for correct around $seventy and offered 384 CUDA cores. Equally AMD's Radeon R7 300s started dropping below $100, though, their superior performance made a slightly higher price tag worth paying. For a while at that place, our least expensive recommendation started somewhere between $90 and $100.
Now, after more than a yr of potency at the high end with its Pascal-based 10-serial cards, Nvidia is gear up to challenge AMD's entry-level position with GeForce GT 1030.
Gigabyte sent over its GeForce GT 1030 Low Profile 2G to correspond Nvidia's latest addition. The carte du jour ships with a full-sized slot bracket in identify, but it includes a one-half-tiptop subclass for slim enclosures too. Although our sample is actively cooled, Gigabyte likewise sells a passive model sporting the same clock rates. Low-profile and passively-cooled? Yup.
GeForce GT 1030'due south TDP is a mere 30W, so we can already estimate that power consumption, thermals, and acoustics will exist some of this board's advantages over the competition. But tin can it continue upwardly in our criterion suite? After all, that'due south what determines whether the GT 1030 succeeds GT 730 in our list of gaming graphics cards.
Meet GP108
GeForce GT 1030 utilizes an all-new graphics processor chosen GP108, equanimous of 1.eight billion transistors. Information technology's a teeny thing at only 70mm², cheers to the aforementioned 14nm FinFET process used to manufacture GP107. Compare that to GeForce GT 730'due south GK208 chip with 1.02 billion transistors in an 84mm² dice. Or how most the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, which we're making the GT 1030 battle in today's benchmarks? That card'southward GM107 GPU has a similar transistor count every bit GP108, merely in a 148mm² dice, attributable to its 28nm manufacturing process.
Here's the matter, though: whereas GeForce GTX 750 Ti employs five Streaming Multiprocessors, GT 1030 comes equipped with three. Given 128 CUDA cores per SM/SMM in the Pascal and Maxwell architectures, that'due south 384 cores for GT 1030 and 640 for GTX 750 Ti. Both designs also betrayal eight texture units per SM, totaling 24 on GeForce GT 1030, while GTX 750 Ti gets twoscore. The ii GPUs feature a pair of ROP partitions, giving you up to 16 32-bit integer pixels per clock. However, those partitions are aligned with 256KB slices of L2 cache on GP108 and 1MB slices of L2 on GM107. That ways GeForce GT 1030 includes 512KB L2 total—a big reduction from GTX 750 Ti's 2MB. And whereas GeForce GTX 750 Ti utilizes ii 64-chip memory controllers, GT 1030's specs break the retention motorbus down into a pair of 32-bit controllers, adding up to a 64-chip interface. That'due south a lot of lost resources for a ~four% difference in complexity.
Nvidia goes a long way to overcoming those deficits in GT 1030 with higher clock rates. Our sample employs a 1227 MHz base of operations frequency and a typical GPU Boost rating of 1468 MHz. In contrast, GeForce GTX 750 Ti starts at 1020 MHz and boosts but slightly to 1085 MHz. Of grade, a 64-bit amass retention bus cripples GT 1030's meridian bandwidth to 48 GB/south using six Gb/s GDDR5; GTX 750 Ti'due south wider interface facilitates upwards to 86.iv GB/s.
GeForce GT 730: The Real Competition
But call back that GTX 750 Ti launched equally a $150 card, and even at present sells for $100 and up. Nosotros're only fascinated past the comparing to GT 1030 because of their similar transistor counts. In reality, GeForce GT 1030 is the spiritual successor of GT 730 since Nvidia never created a 900-series product beneath the $160 GTX 950. Spec-wise, the Kepler-course GeForce GT 730 is a much closer match with 384 CUDA and xvi texture units beyond two SMXes, viii ROPs, 512KB of L2 cache, and a 64-scrap interface. Also, GT 730's 38W lands a lot closer to GT 1030'southward 30W specification. GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a 60W card, and we haven't seen evidence that it can be passively cooled in a low-profile form factor.
So why is GP108 so much more complex of a GPU than GK208? The ii GPUs exercise span a couple of different architectures, and so they're organized differently, for starters.
GP108 utilizes a single Graphics Processing Cluster with three Streaming Multiprocessors. Over again, each SM includes 128 CUDA cores, 8 texture units, 24KB of L1/texture cache, and 64KB of shared address infinite. Meanwhile, GK208 employs ii larger SMXes, each with 192 CUDA cores, eight functional texture units, 64KB of shared memory and L1 cache, and a split texture cache. GP108 also sports 16 ROP units to GK208's 8.
In the cease, GP108 offers a much higher pixel fill rate than GK208 (xix.8 GP/s vs. vii.2 GP/s). Its texture rate is much greater, also (29.8 GT/due south vs. 14.four GT/s). Further, Nvidia says that the work it did to enable Pascal's aggressive clock rates and proper asynchronous compute support via dynamic load balancing added to the transistor upkeep. GeForce GT 1030 uses a complete GP108 processor—there are no disabled resources waiting to be switched on. Information technology'south just a much denser GPU than GK208.
The contest from AMD lands somewhere betwixt GM107 and GK208. Its Radeon RX 550 is a little more than expensive (~$85) and slightly more power-hungry (50W). We've seen low-profile and "single-slot" versions, simply not both. Nothing with passive cooling, either. On the other hand, you get 512 Stream processors, 32 texture units, and 16 ROPs in a 2.2 billion-transistor Polaris 12 GPU. That translates to a pixel fill rate of 17.six GP/s and a texturing rate of 35.2 GT/s. Faster 7 Gb/due south GDDR5 modules on a wider 128-fleck memory bus give AMD a 233% theoretical bandwidth advantage, too.
And yet, Nvidia tells u.s.a. its GeForce GT 1030 should merchandise blows with AMD's pricier solution. If that turns out to be truthful, it'd be quite an achievement for a smaller and simpler graphics bill of fare able to fit into PCs that might non accommodate a Radeon RX 550.
MORE: All-time Graphics Cards
MORE: Desktop GPU Performance Bureaucracy Table
MORE: All Graphics Content
Source: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gt-1030-2gb,5110.html
Belum ada Komentar untuk "Asus Nvidea Geforce Gt Oc 2gb 1030 Reviews"
Posting Komentar